6. Engagement & Culture

Self-Determination Theory

The engine under engagement

Use when

Designing motivation inside constraints; auditing why engagement is flat

Self-Determination Theory, shown as a grid of 3 parts: Autonomy, Competence, Relatedness.

Autonomy

Authorship over how work gets done. Not the absence of constraint: meaningful choice inside one.

Competence

Usable skill, real feedback, visible progress. Stretch without support kills this.

Relatedness

Belonging and a credible social contract with the people and the institution.

Constrained choice beats both free choice and no choice.

How to use it

A funded menu of five options an employee picks from produces more felt autonomy than a vague promise of flexibility. Use the three needs as an audit lens on any people program: which need does this serve, and which does it quietly damage?

Card details

Model type
Grid
Origin status
Established
Content last reviewed
28 July 2026

Origin

Established

Edward Deci and Richard Ryan, American Psychologist, 2000.

Used in these workflows

Neighbouring models

NextCompeting Values Framework

Was this useful?