5. Talent & Succession

The nine-box grid

A conversation, not a verdict

Where a collective agreement applies, it governs. Check the agreement before applying any of this.

Use when

Talent reviews; portfolio view of a leadership population

The nine-box grid, shown as a grid of 9 parts, vertical axis Potential, horizontal axis Performance (sustained, evidenced): Unclear, Growth talent, Top talent, Inconsistent, Core solid, High performer, Underperformer, Effective specialist, Trusted professional.
Potential

Unclear

High potential, low performance: wrong seat? new? blocked?

Growth talent

Develop with stretch; watch trajectory

Top talent

Accelerate, expose, retain deliberately

Inconsistent

Diagnose with AMO before labelling

Core solid

The backbone; develop in role, respect it

High performer

Big roles now; test potential with stretch

Underperformer

Act with dignity and pace

Effective specialist

Deepen craft; do not force the ladder

Trusted professional

Reward mastery without promotion pressure

Performance (sustained, evidenced)

How to use it

The grid is only as good as its inputs: define potential behaviourally (learning agility, scope appetite, people followership), demand evidence for placements, and treat every box as a conversation starter, not a filing decision. Never let box labels leak as identities. These are labels for a conversation about support, never labels for a person. If a box name would embarrass you to say to the individual, do not use it. The real output is the actions list, reviewed next cycle for movement.

Card details

Model type
Grid
Origin status
Established
Content last reviewed
28 July 2026

Origin

Established

Attributed to McKinsey work with General Electric, 1970s.

Used in these workflows

Neighbouring models

NextBuild, borrow, buy

Was this useful?